SCOTLAND’S meat wholesalers have called on the UK Government to provide "much-needed clarity" on the practical and technical aspects of how Scottish companies can continue to trade with customers in the European Union after Brexit.
The Scottish Association of Meat Wholesalers this week warned that the red meat sector was heading for !substantial market turbulence" during the UK’s exit from the EU.
Writing to Secretary of State Alister Jack, the president of SAMW, Andy McGowan, stated that without some clarity from the UK Government about how it intends to practically manage EU exports, the whole of Scotland’s farming and meat processing chain would be plunged into a period of "great uncertainty".
“If left unresolved, this lack of action could cause untold and long-lasting damage to the livestock supply chain throughout the UK, and especially here in Scotland where livestock farming is central to the viability of rural communities,” Mr McGowan said.
“Trade with our customer base in Europe was worth an estimated £85 million in 2019, so greatly helps to underpin some 3,000 jobs across the Scottish red meat processing sector along with thousands more in the primary livestock farming sector. We therefore believe that it is crucial that all current red meat export activity to the EU market is maintained," he said. "This will provide viability for the UK red meat sector, and primary livestock producers, during what is already a period of great uncertainty which could, if not carefully managed by the UK Government, lead to substantial market turbulence.
“Furthermore, there is a significant amount of intra-company trade between processing plants in Scotland and Northern Ireland and the lack of clarity around practical procedures required to move meat between these two parts of the United Kingdom is a serious concern.”
The SAMW letter also included the comment that this new request for support from the Secretary of State for Scotland follows a similar request to the Defra Secretary of State, George Eustice, made by the British Meat Processors Association in England and Wales. Mr McGowan pointed out that the BMPA request, which was made a number of weeks ago, was still "regrettably" awaiting a reply.
SAMW’s list of ‘practical requests’ includes:
• That the UK clarifies the precise format of the health mark to be applied, for both processors located in both GB and NI, and when the new format can be rolled out for use on the factory floor so that companies can finalise the purchase of labelling and packaging materials, which can have long lead-in times;
• That the UK CVO has communicated these changes to our internal certification and health mark arrangements with her opposite numbers in other third country competent authorities and received acknowledgement and agreement from them to start using these marks on product exported to their territories;
• That the UK has devised a workable scheme that allows groupage and mixed loads to be sent to the EU and that companies have advanced knowledge of the details so they can adapt their product despatch procedures accordingly;
• That the UK has sufficient affordable veterinary (or other) resource to provide the significantly increased volume of health certification to the timetable that the industry will require;
• That access to health certification documentation will be largely automated, business friendly and at low cost.
The SAMW letter also stated that the current framework, as proposed by Defra, to implement the Northern Ireland Protocol, needs to be "urgently revised" to remove existing anomalies and grey areas of interpretation which could give processors in NI a commercial advantage over their counterparts in GB.
For in-depth news and views on Scottish agriculture, see this Friday’s issue of The Scottish Farmer or visit www.thescottishfarmer.co.uk
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel