By Ian McConnell
SCOTTISH Investment Trust says its portfolio would have required a "proportionately large exposure to a very small number of companies" that it believes are “greatly overvalued” to have kept pace with global markets this year.
The Edinburgh-based trust’s chairman, James Will, flagged the dominance in global markets of a “momentum” style of investing which he claimed “seemingly pays scant regard to valuation”. He described this as “an anathema” to SIT’s “value-focused” style of investing, as the trust announced it had made a negative total return on net asset value of 10.6 per cent in the year to October 31.
The £663 million trust does not have a formal benchmark.
Mr Will noted the total return in sterling terms on the MSCI All Country World Index over the same period was positive, coming in at 5%. However, he added that there was a negative total return of 20.6% on the MSCI UK All Cap Index.
Mr Will said: “To have kept pace with global markets this year, our portfolio would have required a proportionately large exposure to a very small number of companies that we believe are greatly overvalued and a lot less exposure to the names which we consider offer the best potential for long-term gains.”
SIT proposes a final dividend of 6.1p, resulting in a 1.8% rise in the total payout for the year to 23.2p a share.
Mr Will said: “Stock market movements have been nearly as extraordinary as the events that swept the world. Fear and euphoria made their mark in equal measure, resulting in a period of significant volatility. The health and economic costs are still being counted, although, for the year under review, the significant interventions by governments and central banks have largely defined outcomes for equity investors.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel