CHANCELLOR Rishi Sunak’s “can’t protect everyone” mantra might as well be “won’t” for many across occupations including health and social care and construction.
There are millions of people who are self-employed, mostly people who work for themselves or who are business owners, but also freelance and agency workers, and many have received critical grant support despite delays and deplorable decisions.
Who is it he’s not helping when ten per cent of self-employed people are 65 or over, and one in five working men and one in ten women are self-employed?
Office for National Statistics figures for 2019 show that just 3% of employees are over 65. Two-thirds of self-employed people are men, about 3.3 million, with 1.7 million women self-employed.
Biggest area for men is construction, biggest for women is the health and social work industry.
Of the series of grants for self-employed people, none has really quite managed to cover everyone.
Many must wonder why it took so long for the Chancellor to include a further 600,000 people in his Budget this time.
John McAuslin, Johnston Carmichael tax partner and head of corporation tax, said in a post-Budget Herald discussion that “one of the gaps that he hasn’t quite addressed yet are those ones who have their own companies and some of their earnings have been taken through dividends and therefore they haven’t been able to purely due to the way the calculation is made”. Some people newly self-employed during 2019/20 may also still be left without help.
It’s not just people who are self-employed who have found the Chancellor less than protective.
READ MORE: Ian McConnell: Tory response portrayed as something of wonder but reality is very different
Business Editor Ian McConnell writes in his post-Budget column that Mr Sunak’s “dilly-dallying was giving employers a major problem in terms of visibility on support and, experts believe, triggering many job losses”.
There was a good run for FTSE leisure and travel stocks post-roadmap “but the reality is the leisure industry faces an extremely challenging and uncertain few months to come,” writes Scott Wright, Deputy Business Editor, in his column this week. Mitchells & Butlers, owner a vast portfolio including the famous Horse Shoe Bar in Glasgow, took steps to raise a “critical £351 million from investors to safeguard its financial stability”.
A venerable Scottish institution’s move over a moniker attracted interest after appearing in Mark Williamson’s column this week. “The Standard Life name must be one of the best known in the UK pensions world but Edinburgh-based Standard Life Aberdeen has apparently decided it has no need for it,” he writes, as he examines whether this bodes ill for Scotland’s once mighty pensions industry.
Speaking ahead of the Budget in Kristy Dorsey’s employment focus, Liz Cameron, chief executive of the Scottish Chambers of Commerce, contended “furlough, or the successor to it, needs to continue for a minimum of nine months, and thereafter should be consistently reviewed based on the rate of economic recovery and the employment situation”. It is likely there will be some form of furlough support for the longer term but given the Chancellor’s tendency towards less rather than more roadmap visibility we probably won’t know until the last minute. Surely Mr Sunak’s other slogan “our plan is the right one”, should be “our new plan is the right one”.
These are tough times and as I’ve said before, we can’t protect every business and every household. The OBR today have been clear that if we had not taken the actions we have, the situation would be much worse.
— Rishi Sunak (@RishiSunak) April 14, 2020
In other words, our plan is the right one. pic.twitter.com/BxfLgzzqio
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here