When Professor Jason Leitch warned last week that there will be further coronavirus variants and the next one could be much more severe than Omicron, one Glasgow Chamber member in the hospitality industry could hardly contain his anger.
Recovery for his business depends on a sustained relaxation of existing restrictions and the return of consumer confidence in all those life-affirming activities that involve gathering together – the very opposite of social distancing.
Simply floating the possibility that a new – as yet undiscovered – variant could be damaging is the exact opposite of what he needs.
At least when the World Health Organization’s special envoy for Covid-19, David Nabarro, said broadly the same thing on Monday, he added that "looking at it from a UK point of view, there does seem to be light at the end of the tunnel".
The UK may be amongst the first countries where the pandemic becomes endemic and we learn to live with the virus without any form of lockdown restriction. The progress in distributing effective vaccinations is paying off and perhaps now is the time, with half the winter now passed, that we exploit our collective achievement.
No doubt the public health experts must err on the side of caution in their advice, especially when there are unusual pressures on the NHS, but there must equally be a point when that natural, understandable pessimism is taken into account when politicians make their decisions or, to use stock market terminology, discounted. That does not mean it is ignored, just that there has to be some genuinely new and compelling evidence before it has additional impact.
The Omicron variant has turned out to be milder than even the most optimistic Sage scenarios suggested. It is perhaps irritating to the public health advisers that businesses in the most affected sectors are now regularly pointing that out and also looking back to the summer when restrictions were lifted without the negative consequences those advisers had predicted. But for so many business owners this has been two years of financial and mental torture and they are justified in asking for the public health advice to take a less senior role in the Scottish Government’s four harms assessment.
In the absence of new public health evidence the remaining three harms – wider health, social and economic – must surely grow in significance. Just as one example of the continuing economic harm, in December the footfall in Glasgow city centre’s prime shopping streets was two million less than it had been two years ago; a drop of just over 37%. That has translated into at least the same drop in turnover for city centre businesses in hospitality, retail, tourism and culture.
Nor has the Scottish Government’s financial assistance, welcome though it most certainly is, come even close to bridging the gap so many businesses have faced for a second Christmas running.
One entertainment business I spoke to had lost over £2 million in turnover over the Christmas period and would be lucky to secure grant support in the low tens of thousands.
Another tourism business will not receive any support at all because the government’s eligibility criteria strangely exclude it from applying.
As the Omicron wave recedes, the threshold of proof for applying measures including social distancing, working from home, international travel constraints and vaccine passports must surely become markedly higher. None of these measures is costless.
The Scottish Government is gradually lifting its restrictions but in creating its fresh strategic framework it would be helpful if it took to heart the principle that no restriction will be applied a day longer than is necessary.
Stuart Patrick is chief executive of Glasgow Chamber of Commerce.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel