Sir Tom Hunter and Lord Willie Haughey have urged the Scottish Government to hit the pause button on plans for its controversial deposit return scheme.
Speaking on their Go Radio Business Show, Sir Tom said: “The Scottish Chambers of Commerce, the Scottish Council for Development, the Federation for Small Business, Scottish Wholesale Association and CBI Scotland all came together to write a letter to the First Minister of Scotland saying: ‘Please delay this until you listen to businesses, our questions and our ideas.’
“But here’s the political point. Am I right in thinking the Scottish Government need the UK Government’s approval? And they only asked for it last week?”
Lord Willie pointed out this was certainly a bone of contention, adding: “Some people are saying they don’t need approval and others are saying they do. However, what I thought was most interesting is this is just another policy where things have not been properly thought through. It’s back to a situation where they should have taken twice as long to look at the downsides.
“The people who are trying to operate it are even finding that some of the machines have broken down already.
“I think this has a long way to go but the best thing to do is to take that advice from all those bodies mentioned and just pause it until you know it’s workable.
“At the moment, it looks just like all of the other parliamentary bills – in fact, the last three or four bills that have been put through – that have all been rushed.”
Sir Tom admitted the difficult thing for him personally was the fact the deposit return scheme had been pushed by the Greens who, he said, simply do not believe in economic growth.
“I’m not sure what they believe in order to pay for social services in Scotland, but they don’t believe in economic growth,” he said. “Every one of the candidates to be First Minister is going to pause the scheme. So why don’t the Greens admit this is inevitable? Press pause and don’t cause businesses any more worry or money.
“We should be saying: ‘Wait until we have a new First Minister’. He or she can then take a view on this.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel