This lovely descriptive word, used mostly in the north-east, is defined by the Dictionaries of the Scots Language (DSL) as "a lump or chunk of any solid substance, especially a knot of hardened dirt, dung, or matted hair, hanging from the coat or tail of an animal”. DSL continues: “As a term of abuse; an undersized, dirty cheeky fellow”.
In William Grant’s Scots Anecdotes of 1885, we have: “It’s nae a stone ava but a knapdaerlick that hung at ane o my stots’ [bullock] tails a the last summer”. An even less pretty picture is glimpsed in the following example from Helen Beaton’s At the Back o Benachie (1915): “His hair hings in knapdarlochs, like a coo’s tail clortit wi ile”. DSL also gives a quotation from an Aberdeen correspondent from 1929: “The beggar wis a sair sicht, her raggit claes wallopin in knapdarlochs as she hobble’t awa”.
More recently, it appeared in the Press and Journal (August 1995) - although it clearly needed some explanation: “Look up the P&J (July) an ye’ll see the wird I used wis ‘knapdarlochs’ an yer face I doobt will noo be the colour o the turkey cock. They’re nae a bonnie sicht”.
And later, again in the Press and Journal, the following letter was published (March 2017): “Supervising them is the new Meat Hygiene Service and a host of inspectors whose cost is exceeded only by their patent ineffectiveness… We are still at the political point-scoring stage, and the TV luvvies have discovered stirks sporting knapdarlochs”.
Scots Word of the Week is written by Pauline Cairns Speitel. Visit DSL Online at https://dsl.ac.uk.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here