Vitali Vitaliev makes a number of odd statements in his article of February 3 on refugees and asylum-seekers in Sighthill, Glasgow.

I doubt that more than 40 organisations across Scotland deal solely with asylum-seeker and refugee issues; the real story in Scotland is the way that many more voluntary, community, faith, and statutory-sector organisations have, in addition to continuing with their other work, developed new projects and adapted their services to meet the needs of those arriving here over the last three years.

I see little evidence of organisations ''spongeing off'' the problem. Which-ever sector they are in, those working or volunteering with asylum-seekers and refugees are among the most highly committed, hard-working, energetic, compassionate, and passionate people whom you are likely to meet in public service.

I find the suggestion that public funding defines an organisation as being among the ''spongers'' ridiculous. Where does Mr Vitaliev think the majority of the money for the Sighthill One-Stop Shop, a project that he rightly praises, comes from? I am similarly bemused by the conception that organisations with faxes, computers, spacious offices, and, even worse, coffee machines are in some way less likely to do valuable face-to-face work with asylum-seekers. How does it benefit asylum-seekers and refugees

if some of the smaller organisations that work so hard to serve them lack basic equipment?

Ideas such as these are very much akin to those in the pages of the right-wing tabloid press that Mr Vitaliev derides, a press that generally seems to think that services for those excluded by society, among whom asylum-seekers and refugees are one of the least popular groups, should be delivered by Mother Teresa types working on a shoestring and making do with whatever they have.

Nick Hopkins,

7 Garrioch Quadrant,

Glasgow.