Japanese Second World War leader Hideki Tojo wanted to keep fighting even after US atomic bombs destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, accusing surrender proponents of being "frightened," a newly released diary reveals.
Excerpts from the approximately 20 pages written by Tojo in the final days of the war and held by the National Archives of Japan were published for the first time in several newspapers yesterday.
"The notes show Tojo kept his dyed-in-the-wool militarist mentality until the very end," said Kazufumi Takayama, the archives curator. "They are extremely valuable."
Tojo, executed in 1948 after being convicted of war crimes by the Allies, was prime minister during much of the war. The notes buttress evidence that Tojo was fiercely opposed to surrender.
"We now have to see our country surrender to the enemy without demonstrating our power up to 120%," Tojo wrote on August 13, 1945, two days before Japan gave up.
Tojo criticised his colleagues, accusing government leaders of "being scared of enemy threats and easily throwing their hands up". Surrender proponents were "frightened by the new type of bomb' and terrified by the Soviet Union's entry into the war," he wrote.
The writing is remarkable considering it was penned days after the US atomic bombs incinerated Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing 200,000 people and posing the threat of the destruction of Japan.
The notes first came to the notice of the government when Tojo's defence lawyer, Ichiro Kiyose, gave them to the Justice Ministry. They were made available to researchers last year.
On August 10, 1945, Tojo claimed the purpose of the war was to "maintain stability in East Asia and defend our country."
On August 14, 1945, the day before Japan surrendered, Tojo wrote in a note addressed to a former aide that he took "moral responsibility for causing useless deaths, even though they were meant to be sacrifice for a great cause".
"I am determined to offer an apology with my death," he wrote.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article