A government minister and a leading disability rights group have raised concerns as the country's biggest health authority prepares to award a £2m taxi contract to a private hire company.
Communities minister Stewart Maxwell, the West of Scotland MSP, said he was concerned that Network Private Hire (NPH) appeared to lack a fleet capable of carrying disabled patients, adding that there were questions over whether the firm would be licensed for NHS work.
He also criticised NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde for being "evasive" in announcing and answering questions about the contract, which was provisionally awarded to NPH last month.
NPH, in its contract bid, said it had a fleet of 750 vehicles and pledged to purchase a further 56 "facility cabs" to carry wheelchair users.
Alan Dickson, chief executive of Capability Scotland, said it was "crucial" that wheelchair accessible cars were available for NHS patients. He added: "Letting a contract for transport to and from hospitals that does not provide for disabled people will only result in them incurring expense in organising their own transport, or missing their appointments."
A report submitted by GG&C health board on August 18 recommended approving the award of the contract to NPH following its " well structured and well thought out" bid, but a spokeswoman for the health board said that final approval had not been given as " matters have arisen that are still being considered by the board".
Mr Maxwell said that "too many questions" remained over NPH's suitability to operate the services. "Despite reassurances from the health board, I remain concerned that NPH appears to lack the necessary fleet of vehicles to meet the needs of patients who have mobility problems and who require wheelchair accessible cabs," he said.
Furthermore, North Lanarkshire Council's head of legal services, June Murray, said it would not "knowingly permit" the licensing of vehicles whose base was outside the council area.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article