THE glorious romance of Paul Verlaine and Arthur Rimbaud set the template for every skinny-assed, would-be libertine who ever ended up propping up the bar of any self-consciously scene-making rest home for beautiful losers. That latter-day wasted youth should latch on to such a nineteenth-century ideal as that espoused by a pair of blood-sucking poets speaks volumes about how utterly retro, if a whole lot more literate, most pop culture is today.
Stewart Laing's Untitled Productions has concocted a very private view of Verlaine and Rimbaud's private lives. Utilising a script by Pamela Carter, Untitled dissects the affair through a series of bathroom liaisons, witnessed by an audience of 30 from the balcony of a purpose-built stink-pit.
For the audience, straining to take in every nook, cranny and tangled limb below, it's a bit like clambering astride a public toilet cubicle and getting off on the illicit activity below.
From love-lust at first sight to obsession, claustrophobia, growing pains and, for Verlaine at least, obliteration by domestic torpor, down the pan is where it's at. Especially when Madame Bovary is used as toilet roll.
At times, such is the abandon, gay or otherwise, of Robin Laing and Sam Swainsbury giving it their all alongside Kate Stannard as Verlaine's wife Mathilde, things feel like Withnail and I without the laughs (a good thing), but with a whole lot more frankness.
For all its blood and bodily fluids, though, this is a surprisingly conventional poke around poetic sensibilities. Strip away the novelty staging, and, ultimately, Carter and Laing have created a love story, with all the doomed, self-destructive streaks inherent (or more often courted) by wannabe artists intent on crashing, burning, and, hopefully, coming out the other side.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article