As the Pope reached out to his global audience from the central balcony of St Peter’s Basilica in Rome yesterday, the Vatican remained focused on Thursday night’s incident, which raised again the question of how the Pope can be protected while still having close contact with people.
Susanna Maiolo, 25, an Italian-Swiss national, caused chaos on Christmas Eve when she jumped over a barricade in the basilica, lunged at Pope Benedict, grabbed his vestments and caused him to fall to the floor.
Members of the congregation screamed as they became aware of Ms Maiolo’s assault, with many capturing the attack on their mobile-phone cameras.
After a few seconds, the Pope stood up with the help of attendants, put back on his mitre and continued down the aisle to cheers of “Viva il Papa!” (“long live the Pope”). He continued to celebrate the Mass without further incident.
French-born Cardinal Roger Etchegaray, 87, who has been in frail health recently, toppled over during the assault and was taken away in a wheelchair. He suffered a broken femur and will have to undergo surgery but is not in a serious condition.
The Vatican described Ms Maiolo as “psychologically unstable”, adding that the Pope was not hurt in any way. She was taken to an Italian hospital for psychological treatment.
She also tried to assault the Pope during last year’s Midnight Mass, the Vatican confirmed. Then, Ms Maiolo jumped the barricade but did not manage to reach the Pope and was tackled by security.
Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi said it was impossible to provide watertight security for the Pope because being close to people is part of his mission.
“It is impossible to prevent every possibility of something happening, even at close range,” he said.
“The Pope wants to have a direct, pastoral relationship with people where you can touch children, shake hands and do what you want to do and what the people want you to do.
“If you want watertight security, you can’t do that. Being out of touch with people, being far from them, runs against the spirit of his mission.”
In his “Urbi et Orbi” (“to the city and the world”) message, the 82-year-old Pope said today’s world had to rediscover the simplicity of the Christmas message. People should “abandon every logic of violence and vengeance and engage with renewed vigour and generosity in the process which leads to peaceful coexistence,” he said.
He added that while the world was currently steeped in a grave financial crisis, it was also affected “even more by a moral crisis, and by the painful wounds of wars and conflicts”.
The Archbishop of Westminster, Vincent Nichols, leader of Catholics in England and Wales, said the attack on the Pope had surprised him, given the heightened security at the Vatican.
“It’s surprising that it happened inside St Peter’s, because the security there has changed a great deal in recent years and is much more tight than it used to be,” he said.
“But there it is. I’m sure those arrangements will be reviewed and greater care will be taken,” he added.
There have been few security breaches in Pope Benedict’s pontificate, which began in 2005. In 2007 a German man jumped over a barricade in St Peter’s Square as the Pope’s jeep was passing during a general audience and tried to board the vehicle.
The most serious attack on a Pope in the Vatican was in 1981 when Turkish gunman Mehmet Ali Agca shot and nearly killed Pope John Paul II in St Peter’s Square.
While visitors to the basilica must pass through metal detectors and spot-checks, security once they get inside is relatively light. Vatican security is shared by a police force and Swiss Guards.
Pope Benedict is due to visit Scotland in 2010. It will be the first Papal visit since John Paul II’s pastoral trip in 1982, when crowds of thousands turned out to welcome him in Glasgow’s Bellahouston Park and Murrayfield Stadium in Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article