The Director of Public Prosecutions for England and Wales, where assisted suicide is a statutory offence, said that relatives of people who kill themselves will not face prosecution as long as they do not maliciously encourage them and assist only a "clear, settled and informed wish" to commit suicide.
Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini said there was no need for such guidelines in Scotland, where there is no offence of assisted suicide, but helping another person to end their life may amount to homicide depending on the circumstances of the case.
Her comments were welcomed by Independent MSP Margo MacDonald, who said that legislation was the only proper way in which to clarify the issue. But Jeremy Purvis, Liberal Democrat MSP, said that the lack of guidance north of the border was "deeply regrettable".
He said: "The proposed guidance that they are consulting on in England is very helpful. It is specific. It is also sympathetic and tolerant. I agree that the focus has to be on changing the law but the guidance that is being consulted on does move the debate forward. Unfortunately it is the reverse in Scotland, which is deeply disappointing.
"The position of the Lord Advocate sets Scotland back with regards to people in very difficult situations knowing how prosecutors will operate and what specific issues they will take into account, especially when that kind of clarity is now being provided south of the border."
Keir Starmer, Director of Public Prosecutions, issued his guidance after the Law Lords backed multiple sclerosis sufferer
Debbie Purdy’s call for a policy statement on whether people who help someone commit suicide should be prosecuted.
He outlined 16 "public interest factors" that would result in someone who helps their relative to end their life facing prosecution and 13 factors against taking legal action.
Mr Starmer said: "There are no guarantees against prosecution and it is my job to ensure the most vulnerable people are protected while at the same time giving enough information to those people like Ms Purdy who want to be able to make informed decisions about what actions they may choose to take."
In a letter sent to Mr Purvis, who had asked Ms Angiolini for clarification on the issue north of the border, the Lord Advocate wrote: "It is important to recognise the different legal landscape in Scotland, where involvement in a suicide might amount to homicide, as well as a different system of public prosecution.
"My position, however, remains that it would be inappropriate in the Scottish context to prepare and publish detailed prosecution guidance in this area."
Ms MacDonald, whose bill on physician-assisted suicide is expected to come before the parliament within the next two months, said the guidelines issued by Mr Starmer may have "confused the issue" in England and she agreed with Ms Angiolini that there was no need for further information to be published in Scotland.
She said: "It is perfectly plain [in Scotland] that the fiscal service will decide after there has been a proper investigation of all the facts whether or not it will be in the public interest to prosecute."
Ms MacDonald said that the focus should be on legislation that would consider the role of doctors, rather than family members, in helping someone to end their life.
She said: "I want to properly examine the whole thing. That would mean people would not go to take advantage of Swiss laws and we would have our own laws worked out in terms of what we think is right and fits in with our attitudes."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article