The risk posed by a new development in South Lanarkshire is such that the town of Douglas should be bulldozed and its residents rehoused at the taxpayers’ expense, Dr Dick van Steenis said.
Dr van Steenis is a Wales-based medic who helped kick-start successful legal action in Corby, where a decommissioned steel works was blamed for local birth defects.
After visiting Douglas this week to address campaigners opposed to the new opencast mine, the expert said authorities were failing to address the threats posed by airborne particles from the site, including increased risk of cancer, asthma, heart attacks and strokes.
“The authorities are doing nothing. Nothing’s being checked, there’s no effective regulation and the quangos are telling whoppers,” he said.
The Mainshill mine, which has already been given the go-ahead by planners and the Scottish Government, is fiercely opposed by local activists.
Campaigners cite numerous studies showing a correlation between high mortality rates and proximity to opencast sites, including work published in the British Medical Journal, and the American Journal of Public Health.
If completed, the mine will be the fourth pit in the area and Douglas will have more opencast mining than any other town in the UK.
Construction has already been hindered by protesters occupying the land with Scotland’s first climate change camp. Earlier this week an activist was arrested after he climbed onto a drilling rig and stopped work for several hours.
Although many protesters have been driven by anger at the mine’s contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions, Dr van Steenis said he was not opposed to coal power plants in principle.
“I’m not anti-coal, but if it’s really in the national interest to mine for it there then they should bulldoze down Douglas and rebuild it in a safer place,” he said.
“It would actually make economic sense – they could then mine the coal under the town as well, build a power station and feed it back into the grid, or sell it. It would create jobs, cut the NHS bill and increase exports.”
Around 100 people attended the talk by Dr van Steenis, including Douglas Community Council vice-chair Lindsay Addison, who is leading local opposition. He said: “We want answers. We want to know why no public health inquiry has ever taken place over the effects of opencasting in the Douglas Valley.
“The statistics are clear – Douglas residents are dying substantially more from certain illnesses than people in non-opencast areas. You can see the dust coming off these mines, off the coal lorries and settling on the windows of our local hospital.”
Scottish Coal, which has permission to extract 1.7 million tonnes of fuel from the site, said there were no grounds for public fears.
While it takes local concerns seriously, the company said, it carried out a full consultation with Lanarkshire Health Authority as part of the planning process and found that cancer deaths were not significantly higher in the Douglas area, despite the three existing mines.
In addition, the company spokesman said, Scottish Coal employees are medically screened every two years, with no evidence found of increased levels of disease.
Scottish Coal also cited a Holyrood guideline which supported the findings of the Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollutants (COMEAP), which advises governments on air pollution. It said “it was considered most unlikely that opencast sites would have any long-term effects on the health of local communities”.
But earlier this month Douglas GPs Dr Robert Flowerdew and Dr Michael Coates quoted another COMEAP study suggesting long-term exposure to air pollutants has an effect on mortality.
While they wished to avoid creating a “panic”, the doctors said, their duty to their patients and the evidence laid before them led them to “feel strongly that the issue of the public health risk of particulates resulting from opencast mining coal should be fully addressed by the authorities.”
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereCommments are closed on this article