With a recent work by Julian Wagstaff and a Bach transcription by Edward Harper, the Edinburgh Quartet yesterday continued to replenish its repertoire, even if it was Haydn, artfully placed at the end of this university lunchtime concert, who stole the show. Though Wagstaff was born in Edinburgh, where he also studied, he is not yet an established name and the audience for his Piano Quintet (preceded by Harper's sombre, serious, viola-driven and scrupulously unsensational version of Bach's G minor Prelude and Fugue) was impressively large.
Its splintery, vinegary back-references to old sounds and styles were given a firm, stark context. The piano part, written for Alina Kolonitskaya, a young Russian friend of the composer, did not distract attention from the strings, yet contributed to the often Russian flavours - romantic, folky, nervy - of the three movements. Shostakovich and Schnittke were among the background (sometimes foreground) presences, and the entire work seemed a sort of haunted, kaleidoscopic portrait gallery, tersely presented in what were suitably brittle tones.
As postlude, the quiet tensions of Haydn's F minor Quartet, Op 55, No 2, made their point all the more keenly, the interplay of major and minor, the sudden swerves and pauses sounding both disturbing and ambiguous. By keeping the action fairly low-keyed, the players - with Charles Mutter back as leader - at times even enhanced its effect.
This was not a concert that spoke out, but it made us listen.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article