Steven Naismith yesterday provided the biggest test yet of Kilmarnock's resolve by submitting a written transfer request to the club.
The move is expected to encourage Rangers to make a final offer for the player whom Kilmarnock value at £2m and leaves the Rugby Park club in a weakened bargaining position.
The Scotland attacker has suffered in silence as three previous bids from Rangers, the team he has supported since childhood, have been rejected by the Rugby Park chairman, Michael Johnston.
Walter Smith, the Rangers manager, hinted last week the club had ended their interest in Naismith, having grown frustrated by Kilmarnock's reluctance to negotiate. The Ibrox club's last offer of £1.5m, comprising appearance-based add-ons, was rejected, with Johnston adamant the Rugby Park club would not accept less than £2m for a player with three years left on his contract.
An unnamed club, widely speculated to be Celtic, were expected to submit a more substantial bid this week and Johnston last night insisted the transfer request would not affect the club' stance.
"It doesn't make any difference to the club's position," said Johnston. "I don't see how that is going to make life easier for him in the short-term. "There's been no formal word from Rangers since the start of the month. Steven's agent has indicated they are willing to come back in with another bid but we have an ongoing dialogue with another major club."
Should Naismith's move to Ibrox go through, he will not feature against FK Zeta when Rangers begin their Champions League qualification campaign next week after the registration deadline for that fixture passed at midnight last night.
The Montenegrins' preparations have been hampered by a failure to obtain enough visas for the squad, with Zeta only issued with 20 permits by the British Embassy in Belgrade.
The club alerted UEFA and Rangers of the problem yesterday amid fears they would have to switch the legs. Vladimir Sisevic, the Zeta director, has requested the help of the Montenegrin government and will make an appointment with the British Embassy today.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article