There was a time, not too long ago that you could easily find a 3 litre bag in box wine for about £13. The quality was never great, as producers at the time were not concerned with using their best wines for this format. You can still find these wines, it’s just that they now come in a 2.25 litre package and they cost £16.
So far, so gloomy. However, these days a few forward thinking winemakers have realised the importance of bag in box, and are now releasing some tasty and interesting new products. This week, I have been tirelessly seeking out the best ones for you to bring home and enjoy.
When in Rome Falanghina IGT Beneventano Enzo Rillo (Waitrose, £25.99 for 2.25 litres). This is both tasty and interesting, and nets down to an equivalent of £8.67 per bottle. This means that it’s expensive for bag in box, but good value in terms of the quality of the wine. The wine itself is light, crisp and refreshing, and perfect for a balmy Glasgow afternoon.
Falanghina is also ideal with posh seafood, and is enjoyed along the Amalfi Coast with the local specialities. If you ask a waiter in Sorrento for a plate of Spaghetti con Vongole and a glass of Falanghina, you’ll be treated like a long-lost family member.
And in the red corner this weekend…
Cotes du Rhone Villages 2016 (M&S, £17 for 1.5 litres). This soft, slightly spicy blend of Grenache and Syrah is ideal for glugging with friends at a barbecue. It’s equivalent to £8.50 per bottle, which is more than acceptable. The only issue is that you’ll need two (or three) to last the night.
So, in conclusion, bag in box is handy, portable and convenient. It can be useful at parties, barbecues and picnics and will even stay fresh in the box for six weeks after opening. Six weeks. Never going to happen in our house.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here