Over the last couple of weeks in this column, I’ve been recommending Barolos and Barbarescos from Piemonte, and Chiantis and Brunellos from Tuscany. I couldn’t possibly move away from Italy without mentioning a decent Amarone from Veneto, or my favourite Aglianicos from Campania in the south.
Amarone della Valpolicella tends to be a blend of Corvina, Molinara and Rondinella, and is made in a big rich style using grapes that have been partially dried in the sun to concentrate the flavours and boost the alcohol. It’s also a go-to wine if you’re buying a gift for a wine connoisseur as it is well known as a good, and expensive treat. You’ll also find Recioto della Valpolicella (a sweeter version) and Valpolicella Ripasso which is a lighter and more affordable wine from the same producers.
Amarone Classico Costasera Masi 2012 (Majestic, £37). This is as traditional as they come with the winemaking knowledge being passed down from generation to generation of the Boscaini family. It’s a big, lush wine with a long, dry finish and it’s the perfect partner to a hearty rabbit stew. If you have any left, try a wee glass with the harder cheeses on the cheeseboard. It works particularly well with parmesan.
Aglianico is the most noble red grape grown in Campania, where it is responsible for the DOCG wine, Taurasi. You’ll also find good examples from Basilicata labelled as Aglianico del Vulture. Like all the best Italian red grapes, it makes a full bodied wine with good tannins and a decent acidity in the glass. The wines are very food-friendly especially when partnered with lamb, or a warming cassoulet.
Terredora di Paolo Aglianico IGT 2016 (Waitrose, £12.99). This is a great example of the style, and it’s half the price that you’d expect to pay for a Taurasi. The volcanic soil of the area adds minerality and a certain gravitas to the wine. Try this with a lamb ragu, and you’ll be immediately transported to the Amalfi Coast…and all for just £12.99. Cheers!
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here