I’m sure you all enjoyed Eurovision live from Tel Aviv last night with a glass or two of Arak, Israel’s national drink. It’s a spirit distilled from grape juice and flavoured with aniseed. The grapes are high quality, and often harvested late to concentrate the sugars. The spirit is then triple distilled making a lighter, finer style and is bottled at high levels of ABV (alcohol by volume) following a period of maceration with the aniseed.
It’s best served with chilled water, and I prefer the ratio of two parts spirit to one part water. The addition of water makes the spirit go cloudy, and as such, it’s not unlike Turkey’s Raki or Greece’s Ouzo.
You don’t often see Arak on the high street, but you can find it online. Kawar Arak Premium Black 53% (Amazon, £37.99) is a particularly good one. As with all cask strength spirits, the Kawar should be treated with a healthy amount of respect.
If you’d prefer a Raki, try a bottle of the Yeni Raki Ala 47% (Master of Malt, £34.95). This is a step up from the standard Yeni Raki (£24.95), and is made with sun dried grapes.
Ouzo is slightly easier to find, although if you don’t have a Greek deli within walking distance, you might still be best to search online. You’ll find a decent selection under £25. I’d recommend the Ouzo 12 as a classic example of the style.
Of course, I can’t mention Eurovision without also recommending a certain cream liqueur. Terry Wogan famously enjoyed a glass or two of Baileys whilst presenting the show and I’ve always been a fan of the brand. I’m a bit of a purist and as such I tend to shy away from the limited editions and any additional flavourings. The original classic in my opinion is the best, and is available in every supermarket and wine shop on the planet. Cheers!
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here