South Africa is a wonderfully diverse country in terms of wine production. You’ll typically find New World fruit combined with a European minerality, but the wines have a certain gravitas rarely found in other areas.
This week, I met Samantha O’Keefe, a Californian farmer and winemaker living and working in South Africa. She bought a dairy farm in Greyton, miles away from any other wine producer, and thirty minutes away from the nearest shop. She carved out her business, planted her vines and has become a favourite of the wine critics in the interim. She took advice in the early days from Peter Finlayson, arguably one of the best South African producers. He said, “If you succeed in Greyton, you will be considered a pioneer. If you fail, no-one will care”.
She is now definitely a pioneer, even a trailblazer and her wines are nothing short of exceptional. Her wine influences are mostly based in the Rhone Valley in France, and you should actively seek out her Viognier and Syrah expressions.
She hosted a tasting for us on Tuesday night, and comparing the wines side by side was a joy and an education.
Here are a few of my favourites for you to try this weekend…
Lismore Barrel Fermented Sauvignon Blanc 2017 (Inverarity One to One, £21.99). Oaked Sauvignon can be clumsy and disappointing, as the primary characteristics of the grape are often overpowered by the wood influence. This is the best example of the style that I’ve ever come across in my 23 years in the trade.
Lismore Estate Reserve Viognier 2017 (Inverarity One to One, £38.99). This is clearly an expensive wine, but the equivalent quality from Condrieu in Rhone would cost twice as much. This is a spectacular wine, to be enjoyed on it’s own as an aperitif or with a really good Thai green curry.
Lismore Estate Reserve Syrah 2017 (Inverarity One to One, £40.99). This beautifully elegant wine is exactly what a Cote Rotie should taste like, but seldom does. If you only buy one £40 red this year, it should be this one. I would have this with a nice bit of venison. Cheers!
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here