What is it?
A portable, AI-powered instant voice language translation device.
When travelling, it's beneficial to be able to communicate using the local language, especially when venturing off the beaten track where you can't simply assume everyone speaks English.
That's where having a translator like Pocketalk comes in handy, be it for basics such as ordering food and drink, or gleaning information about hidden gems, such as a stunning waterfall or a secluded beach.
Good Points?
The design of the device has been well thought out with an oval shape that fits comfortably in most palms and pockets. The button layout and operation are simple enough to have you conversing within moments. This is ideal as you don't want large pauses between translated sentences.
The Pocketalk utilises a straightforward speak and reply button operation sequence to provide the most efficient means to communicate when face to face.
It translates 74 languages and can store up to 10,000 translations. Pocketalk can handle up to 30 seconds of speaking per translation. Included in the package is a built-in global sim so you can translate anywhere straight out of the box hassle free.
Bad points?
Although far less expensive than a smartphone, the Pocketalk is still significantly more costly than other translators on the market. It can't be used offline. An internet connection is required using WiFi, mobile data or a personal hotspot.
Best for ...
Those who view communication barriers as the biggest obstacle to travel. Now you don't need to partake in a high-octane mime act when trying to order a beer or purchase blister plasters.
Avoid if ...
You are only planning staycations until the Brexit storm clouds blow over.
Score: 9/10.
Pocketalk Translator, £259 (amazon.co.uk)
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here