As trendy bamboo hits the headlines for its invasive nature, Hannah Stephenson looks at four common plants which may want to take over your garden.
With reports that neighbours are increasingly at war over invasive bamboo plants spreading out of control, it may be worth considering what other hard-to-get-rid-of species you're unwittingly planting in your garden.
Of course, there's a difference between invasive and vigorous - invasive plants include Japanese knotweed, giant hogweed and Himalayan balsam, which are banned from sale in this country - but there are other plants which may spread too rapidly for your liking, and may be difficult to get rid of once they are planted in the ground.
1. Japanese anemone (A. x hybrida)
Don't be fooled by the dainty-looking late summer/early autumn flowers in shades of white, pink and mauve, because these perennial favourites growing up to 1.2m tall, are also total garden thugs.
Once you've planted them, I hope you really like them because it'll be really difficult to erase them from your plot. They will invade the space of neighbouring plants, taking nutrients from the soil as they go - and it's extremely difficult to totally eradicate them, unless you want to do some back-breaking digging.
They are, however, very pretty, so if you want them in your garden, grow them in a raised bed or in a container so you can keep control of them.
2. Periwinkle (Vinca major and Vinca minor)
Periwinkles are ground cover trailing shrubs which provide eye-catching winter foliage and early flower in shades of blue and white.
They look good in shady spots or wilder areas of the garden and will stop weeds colonising, but can be invasive if not cut back because they send out runners which root when they touch the soil.
So avoid planting them in ordinary borders where they will compete with other plants. If you want to keep them, cut them back to the ground in winter and they will come up again with fresh new growth - but make sure you remove any runners you see popping up where they're not wanted.
3. Lily of the valley (Convallaria majalis)
Each April and May, when the rich scent from the pretty white bell flowers of this pint-sized perennial bulb fill the air, I remind myself why I didn't dig up the mass of these vigorous plants adorning not only a small wooded area of my garden, but also popping up unprompted in flower beds and borders.
Like many invasive groundcovers, convallaria propagates itself from underground rhizomes, producing seeds and spreading rapidly as the root-like rhizomes creep in all directions, throwing up small upright shoots (called 'pips') every few inches.
You can dig them up, but you mustn't leave any roots in the ground or they will re-emerge. Alternatively, cut the flowers before they run to seed.
If you have a small garden, my advice would be to grow lily of the valley in pots, ideally in semi shade close to the patio, where you can inhale the rich scent come late spring, without worrying that the plants are going to take over.
4. Montbretia (Crocosmia x crocosmiiflora)
When I first moved to my current home more than 20 years ago, my garden was awash with hybrid montbretia, the corms producing spear-like leaves and orange flowers in high summer, and multiplying with a vengeance once they took hold.
The underground corms, so overcrowded and undernourished, were nevertheless unstoppable and small fragments of root quickly established themselves. It took years of digging to get rid of them.
You can dig up montbretia but if you leave just one corm, it will re-emerge. And don't chuck it on the compost heap because when you spread the compost on another area, the montbretia is likely to appear again.
However, you can buy less invasive and more showstopping cultivated varieties such as 'Lucifer' - which has a brilliant red flower - so there is still a place for them in my garden.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here