What is it?
A multi-impact, foldable commuting cycle helmet.
Some cyclists will be blissfully unaware – or simply ignore the fact – that it is recommended you replace your cycling helmet every three years even if there's not a scratch on it.
This is because every day environmental factors such as solvents and pollutants, coupled with minor knocks or dropping it, can accumulate to reduce the integrity of the helmet.
The Hedkayse One has been designed to be the world's first helmet that can withstand multiple impacts and still provide protection.
Good Points?
Among the Hedkayse's key features is its special Enkayse polymer that is supple enough to fold yet still incredibly durable compared to traditional polystyrene foam liners which crumple to absorb the impact.
A flexible membrane keeps the protective unit's form while folded in its space-saving shape. This means the helmet can be compressed and reduced in width by 50% – to a mere 13cm (5in) across – then snugly tucked into a bag without fear of damage.
This construction method gives the unit more sizing flexibility and a one-size-fits-all design of between 49cm and 58.5cm (19in to 23in). Not having to measure your head against online guides is a big bonus.
Bad points?
The Hedkayse is a tad more expensive than a casual commuter would normally pay for a helmet. At 495g it is heavier too.
Best for ...
Those who like consistency with comfort as there are few things more annoying than donning a new helmet – only to realise after five rides that it's starting to rub and slip despite being on the tightest setting.
Avoid if ...
Cycling helmets are not your thing. It's a personal choice: your noggin, your decision. I respect that.
Score: 8/10.
Hedkayse One, £150 (hedkayse.com)
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here