WELL, here’s to Week Two of our review of big reds from California and as luck and life would have it, by the time you read this, I'll be sampling a few delights in Napa Valley itself. It’s a dirty job, ladies and gents, but someone has to do it. We dabbled with Cabernet Sauvignon and Zinfandel last week but now it’s time for the fruitier duo of Cabernet Franc and Merlot.
Cab Franc is one of my favourite varieties but it wasn't always the case. It’s a softer, somewhat silkier style to its erstwhile namesake but, for years, the only single grape varietals were from the Loire valley and they were thin and brutal to my palate. California was the first wine-growing region outside France to make me sit up and take notice and for good reason. They took an ugly duckling and turned it into a supermodel with gorgeous raspberry aromas and a smooth silky palate full of redcurrants and hints of vanilla and I've been hooked on this new mistress ever since. It’s easy for critics to say, well, of course, the wines will be good in California, look at the weather but to be honest, the sun shines an awful lot in the south of France but I'd rather have athlete's foot that be forced to drink most of what they make down there. Merlot is perhaps the grape that personifies California wines and it’s a very rare occasion when I stumble across a bad one. Most of the Merlots I've tried have been really good with one or two that are simply divine. If you want to treat yourselves to the latter this Christmas seek out the Nth Degree Merlot from Wente. It’s right up there with your first kiss!
Bogle Merlot, California
Rich red autumn fruits with a lovely hint of vanilla chocolate on the finish. I've tasted Bogle wines many times over the years and I've never felt let down.
Villeneuve Wines £16
Bonterra Organic Merlot, California
Warm plums and dark cherries on the nose leading into a palate full of lush loganberries and cocoa with a soft hint of vanilla on the finish.
Waitrose £12.49
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here