I was going to write about Claret this week but it just felt too serious given the outbreak of coronavirus. In the end, I got out my box set of Porridge and started my search for the perfect not-too-serious wine to share with Fletch and Godba. First on my list were the fabulously fruity wines made by 19 Crimes, a Company named after the 19 different offences that could result in a convicted person being transported to the colonies.
My personal favourite, The Uprising. This gorgeous Shiraz is aged in old rum barrels and has a lovely smoky finish to its whopping alcohol level.
Another obvious choice is The Derange Red blend from the Prisoner Wine Company in the Sonoma Valley. This thing just explodes with blackcurrant fruits and lashings of vanilla on the finish. You need to visit the Wine Company or purchase by mail order but, crikey, it’s well worth the wait.
A cracking contender would be the Judge claret blend from Hester Creek Vineyard in British Columbia. A
friend allowed me to try his precious bottle a week or so ago and I was smitten. It reminded me of a wonderful Leoville Barton, with ripe, dark cherries, chewy fruits and a side order of mint on the finish. I’m not sure what Fletch would make of celebrating a judge, though.
In the end, I decided the perfect wine to enjoy alongside an evening of Porridge was the Police Synchronicity red from The Wines that Rock. It’s a big, Grenache-dominated wine with a bit more on the nose than the palate. But try this with crumbly cheese and you will soon forget the judge’s last words – “take him down”.
Double Trouble Shiraz Cabernet,
Barossa Boy
Cocoa and raspberry on the nose with masses of ripe blackcurrant flavours on the palate. There’s a hint of spice and mint as well and a toasty finish. It’s definitely no trouble to enjoy this.
Corney & Barrow £18.95
19 Crimes, The Uprising, Australia
Ripe Aussie Shiraz aged in rum casks leading to a palate dominated by soft almost sweet black fruits and a rather seductive smoky finish.
Simply Wines Direct £9.99
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here