SIX years ago, my partner's 70-year-old father travelled from Sardinia to visit us. It was his first venture outside of Italy, which, at the time, struck me as odd. His reasons for staying local had nothing to do with economics, aviophobia or a lack of wanderlust. He simply felt there was still so much more to learn about his own country first, and even the urgency of ticking time wouldn't make him rush elsewhere.
Right now, peering through the window at a world which extends no further than a 2km radius, I envy that sense of assured calm. In the current climate, how many of us lament the trips we've never taken, the missed opportunities we let go, the weeks we're having to let waste away?
Amidst the doom and gloom of coronavirus, it can be hard to find even a faint flicker of a silver lining, and while lockdown is a tiny price to pay for potentially saving lives – it's still a price to pay.
Like every life experience, though, there are lessons to be learned – especially concerning the freedom and frequency of our movements around the globe.
Bringing the travel industry to an abrupt halt does have dire economic implications, but there are a few beneficiaries as well. Perhaps one is that, like it or not, being grounded provides an opportunity to appreciate the holidays we've had and to carefully consider the trips we'd like to take.
I was 16 years old when I first buckled up on a plane, and I remember the excitement of taking off and being at eye level with the clouds. But with budget airlines battling to get bums on seats, flights soon became cheaper than a Party Bucket at KFC – and a 'fast flight' mentality took hold.
Once lockdown lifts, I, like many, will be desperate to travel again and I know, wherever I go, I'll value the privilege even more. For now, it's important to research and make informed choices about the destinations we visit, the methods of transport we take and the operators we use. Time is typically the stumbling block in our 'normal' busy lives; but in the 'new normal' it's one of the few remaining things most of us have in almost limitless supply.
Sarah Marshall
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here