Shiraz was first planted in Australia in the 1700s and has become the most widespread and popular variety on the Continent and for good reason. Let’s face it, who hasn't fallen in love with one of those gorgeous jammy wines with no discernible tannins and a seductive touch of pepper on the finish.
The Hunter valley and Barossa are the source of most of the top end versions, but I don't think I've ever tried an Aussie Shiraz that I haven't enjoyed, as a very pleasant evening spent sampling the grape reminded me. I fell head over heals with Grant Burges' famous Black Monster Shiraz in the 1990s and a really furry, rich one from Cape Mentelle. I've made it my mission to try every single one of them over the years and I reckon I'm about halfway there so far. It’s a trial, but Ill do this for all of you!
So, what should you expect in the glass? It’s the colour that gets you first as they look so dark and mysterious. The nose is often like warm bramble jam and there's always a touch of spice or pepper on the finish. Different winemakers can interlace those characteristics like an artist but the style is always recognisable.
Chateau Tanunda Grand Barossa Shiraz
I've always loved the wines from Kaunda and their basic shiraz is gorgeous, but this one is on a different level. Deep dark autumn berries with vanilla and spice clever woven in the layers. It's an absolute corker for the price and I would include it in any collection of fine wines.
Sainsbury’s £16
Peter Lehmann, The Barossan Shiraz
With the intensity of its fruit along with hints of cocoa and liquorice, this is the closest I've ever tasted to the very expensive Cote roti from the Rhone. Not your average Aussie Shiraz but I'd have it in my cellar any day.
Majestic £18.99 per bottle or £14.99 mix six
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here