Dementia the Musical
The Studio, Edinburgh
Neil Cooper
Four stars
Growing old gracefully isn’t easy these days. Once you reach that difficult age you are either patronised or else shunted out of the way in the name of care. Some people, however, simply refuse to kowtow to the system they have no say in legislating.
This is the case for James, Agnes and Nancy, Dementia the Musical’s unrelenting trio who are beamed down into a world of bureaucratic regimes and high backed armchairs that are unlikely to have graced their own homes if they were still allowed to live in them.
What follows sees James, Agnes and Nancy put on trial for being dementia activists by the tellingly named Rigid System. As played by Pauline Lockhart, Ms System is a lady not for turning. James, Agnes and Nancy, meanwhile, have their own stories to tell beyond the TV news reports beamed out between each of their testimonies.
It is these stories that count in Lewis-based poet Ron Coleman’s play, brought to life by director Magdalena Schamberger in a mix of agit-prop, Kafkaesque absurdism and a jazzy set of songs by Sophie Bancroft that reveal each character’s inner lives.
One is reminded at moments of Black Daisies for the Bride, Peter Symes’ care home set 1993 drama-documentary that saw poet Tony Harrison and composer Dominic Muldowney similarly put dementia sufferers lives to music. Here, however, things have a more political intent.
Drawn from the experiences of the real James, Agnes and Nancy, and with musical input from Andrew Eaton-Lewis, these are delivered from the dock by Ross Allan, Kirsty Malone and Fiona Wood with a mix of music theatre pizzazz and polemical intent. The dock itself is ingeniously represented in Karen Tennent’s design by a Zimmer frame.
Lockhart’s Rigid System is a creation that falls somewhere between a Spitting Image Margaret Thatcher and Cruella De Vil, while Willy Gilder becomes a prime-time Greek chorus as the on screen reporter. As the play’s final sequence so movingly shows, the real James, Agnes and Nancy are still going strong, and still fighting for the right to live on their own terms.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here