I've been on a few protest marches in my time - Anti-Poll Tax, Student Grants, Iraq Invasion and Make Poverty History among them.
By the time of that last one during the G8 Summit at Gleneagles, police cameras were being trained on every face walking by and press photographers kneeling in the street to get a dramatic cover shot of protesters in Edinburgh had no immunity when it came to a riot-shield charge. Somehow, holding political principles and wanting to voice them in public had become something to be viewed with suspicion or outright hostility.
None of these events was a life-or-death affair for me, although they were often exactly that for those in whose name we marched. I wasn't likely to suffer by sticking my head above the parapet for an afternoon. The same couldn't be said for those who campaigned for civil rights in the 1960s, as was underlined when Martin Luther King And The March On Washington (BBC Two, Wednesday, 9pm) was broadcast 50 years to the day after that iconic "I have a dream" speech at the Lincoln Memorial.
This was, by its nature, a television history programme. Talking heads relived their first-hand memories of the era, archive footage visualised those memories for today's viewers, and a narrative, read by Denzel Washington, drew the chronology together. But this is not history that is so familiar it doesn't need to be told again and again; neither is it history that is so remote its subject doesn't remain relevant now. There were, however, a few things that made this particular documentary carry more force than usual.
First was the anniversary date of the broadcast. Second was the fact that some of the most horrific images we were watching in our living rooms in 2013 - water cannons turned on black children in Alabama, police dogs set on their parents - had been seen by Americans watching in their living rooms in 1963, helping to turn the country's moral indignation against segregationists such as Bull Connor and George Wallace. Third was the way that the same stretches of road were repeated on screen in black-and-white from back then and in colour from now. Past and present suddenly were not so far apart.
The documentary followed key events through the early months of 1963, with a focus on Birmingham, Alabama; it pushed on through the week-by-week, then day-by-day preparations for the all-important march on America's capital city; it conveyed some of the momentum and excitement of August 28 itself by taking us hour by hour through music turns by Joan Baez, Bob Dylan and Mahalia Jackson, on to the speech itself. I wish the programme had then broadcast Dr King's words in their full 17-minute glory, from "five score years ago" to "free at last". Excerpts had to suffice.
The tragic next chapter of Dr King's story was available over on another channel afterwards in MLK: The Assassination Tapes (BBC Four, Wednesday, 10pm), but I felt it more appropriate to linger on a speech that seemed to come from the pulpit as much as from politics. It put pressure on President Kennedy to push through the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and it changed history through words of peace, not war or hatred. And that truly is something worth marching for.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article