Acis and Galatea
Acis and Galatea
Dunbar Parish Church
Kate Molleson
Don't let anyone tell you Acis and Galatea is too vapid for decent drama, nor that an opera in concert performance can't be properly entertaining. What little plot there is to Handel's 1718 pastoral mini-opera involves a nymph, a shepherd and an evil monster, all lifted from book eight of Ovid's Metamorphoses. Usually a performance is worth sitting through for its gorgeous music alone: this concise little two-acter contains some of Handel's most irresistible tunes.
That John Butt and the Dunedin Consort had such a lark with the characters, invoked such vivid tableaux and reduced the Lammermuir Festival audience into stitches speaks volumes about the blithe spirit of this ensemble.
Fresh from winning a Gramophone Award for their latest recording (Mozart's Requiem), the Dunedins only seem to get better and better. Their academic credentials are long established and increasingly they seem to be letting loose. This performance brought out the flamboyant best in the musicians and the music.
Playing Butt's original Cannons performing version (the differences are subtleties of instrumentation and dramatic pacing) the 12-strong band sounded gutsy, lithe and warm. Pamela Thorby's recorder solos stood out, dazzlingly stylish. The five singers were relaxed, playful and supply balanced in ensemble numbers.
Joanne Lunn was on great form as Galatea, even if her pure, sculpted phrases kept to the chaste side of all the "panting" and "desire".
Nicholas Mulroy's Acis was a breezy, loveable shepherd, his voice totally at home in the role. Matthew Brook gave a deliciously hammed-up account of the raging Polyphemus: he stuck out his tongue, bared his chest and sang an outrageously camp O Ruddier Than the Cherry. Great fun.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article