Brand: A Second Coming (15) Three stars
Dir: Ondi Timoner
Runtime: 102 minutes
HAVING initially asked American filmmaker Ondi Timoner to make a film about him, Russell Brand, naughty boy to most, comedy messiah to some, went ice cold on the idea and refused to co-operate or back the piece when it premiered at the London Film Festival recently. Timoner persevered, and good on her for doing so. She may not have secured much sit-down time with Brand himself, and the little she has is not particularly revealing, but the essential building blocks of the story are there, from his Essex beginnings to the drug taking, fame, riches, and the disgrace of Sachsgate. Like the man himself, a little of Timoner’s film goes a long way, and at 102-minutes, this is a documentary in sore need of pruning. There is only so much of brand Brand the viewer can be expected to take in one sitting. The annoying thing about Brand, as Timoner’s film shows, is that underneath all the posing is a funny, as in ha-ha, guy. Not as amusing, mind, as one of the contributors, his mate Noel Gallagher. His affectionate/exasperated view of Brand seems to be par for the course among those who know him.
Paper Planes (U) Three stars
Dir: Robert Connolly
With: Sam Worthington, Ed Oxenbould
Runtime: 97 minutes
BETWEEN a depressed dad (Sam Worthington) and the attentions of the school bully, 12-year-old Dylan (Ed Oxenbould) does not have his troubles to seek in life. Thank the skies above, then, for his ability to make ace paper planes that travel far, win competitions and take him from Australia all the way to the world championships in Japan. Director Robert Connolly struggles at times to mine drama from the folding of bits of paper - in truth, even Spielberg might have crumpled at that one. This being a family film, there is also the compulsory learning of life lessons along the way, with all the creakiness that entails. For all that, this Aussie drama has a likeable, wholesome, Children’s Film Foundation vibe that takes it a long way, with the ever reliable Worthington and Oxenbould making a winning pairing as father and son.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here