Festival Music
Mikhail Pletnev
Queen’s Hall
Martin Kershaw
five stars
“WRITING about music is like dancing about architecture”, someone once said – never truer than when trying to marshal one’s thoughts on paper about a recital of such astounding quality. Picking holes in a sub-standard, adequate or even basically very good performance is easy, but how do you define in words the magical experience of witnessing a near-flawless display such as this?
To start with the obvious, there is Pletnev's absolute mastery of the material, here exclusively Rachmaninov. Everything is memorised, and his encyclopaedic knowledge of the repertoire is such that you can see why he famously balks at committing to a set programme. Indeed, he went off script pretty early – simply moving from one work to the next (often in segue) as the fancy took him. Next is his touch, never faltering, whether employed to play the simplest melody, render scurrying lines of semi-quavers with crystal clarity, or shake us to the foundation with giant, crashing chords over the full range of the instrument. Finally is his timing. Far too often performers take excessive liberties with their phrasing on late-romantic material, mauling and stretching it out of all recognition. Pletnev never lapsed into this kind of tedious overstatement – his placement, nuance and phrasing showed perfect judgement every time.
There were too many highlights to list here, although I might home in on the Piano Sonata No 1 in D minor which took up the whole of the second half. It was a masterclass in sustained intensity, expressive focus and complete technical control, bringing to a close a concert as near to perfection as you are likely to hear.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here