Theatre
Nests
Traverse, Edinburgh
Mary Brennan
four stars
Everything you see on-stage in Nests is broken. Not just the rotting caravan, or the chaotic clutter – including empty bottles of cheap cider – that make Katy Wilson’s set reek of corrosive destitution. The two vulnerable characters in Xana Marwick’s first play are also in bits: disenfranchised in a world they feel doesn’t know they exist, let alone care about them. If, indeed, the welfare state provides a safety net for the hapless, this pair – a middle-aged man and a twelve year old lad - have already fallen through holes in the system when they encounter each other in a wooded wasteland.
Marwick tags the ramshackle, booze-guzzling man The Father, but there’s no blood tie to The Boy (Ashleigh More) who’s run away from home – mind you, as this wary pair form an awkward companionship, the Father (David McKay) wishfully persuades himself that this lost boy is his own abandoned kin. And there you have the can of worms that Marwick unrelentingly prises open, challenging us - through gradual fragments of background information – to decide where moral responsibility and duty of care lie. With society or with the individual?
Meanwhile, in parallel – and in animated outline across three TV monitors – is the boy’s pet Crow, whose sense of community, parenting skills and savvy survival tactics are a reproach to our own inadequacies. Director Heather Fulton (of co-producers Frozen Charlotte) is pleasingly wise to Marwick’s ploy of off-setting grim realities with the richer inner imaginings and creative impulses of her characters.
When More’s Boy loosens his defensive sullenness, you glimpse the engagingly bright, inquisitive lad whose future is being blighted by circumstance while McKay’s Father is a cannily nuanced amalgam of guilt, despair, impotent anger – at himself, and those in power – that melts away when he plays guitar and sings for The Boy. Is all lost? Perhaps a welcome sequel will offer a shared redemption.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here