Theatre
Nora: A Doll’s House
Tramway
Neil Cooper
Five stars
THREE women walk through different doors at the start of Stef Smith’s revolutionary reimagining of Henrik Ibsen’s 19th century meditation on women, men and power. It is as if they have broken through the frames that captured their once-still lives to map out a brand new story for themselves in colours of rage, making history as they go.
This is just the first act of liberation in Smith’s version of the play, which puts three Noras from crucial moments in that history onstage. In an equally crucial move, the three actresses who play Nora in 1918, 1968 and 2018 double up to become different versions of Nora’s former best friend Christine.
With the men who control them similarly represented down the ages, Smith’s device exposes just how little has changed over the last century in terms of everyday domestic abuse. As the women are blackmailed emotionally, intellectually and sexually into sorting out their own economic disenfranchisement, their coping methods too are the same. Only the drugs are different.
This makes for an explosive couple of hours in Elizabeth Freestone’s slow-burning production, which makes flesh of Smith’s writing on Tom Piper’s timeless-looking set. While Tim Barrow, Michael Dylan and Daniel Ward play the men with various degrees of neediness, brutality and desperation, it is the women who are the heart of the piece. And Anna Russell-Martin as the present day Nora, Maryam Hamidi as her 1968 version and Molly Vevers playing her 1918 incarnation are fearless and heroic in the fire and life they bring to the roles.
Onstage throughout, the trio seem to gain strength from one another as they go. When they incant in unison, their spoken-word arias give voice to the hidden desires that ebb and flow beyond Nora’s self-imposed life in lavender. And when they dance in shapes choreographed by Emily-Jane Boyle to Michael John McCarthy’s brooding underscore that suddenly flares up into floor-shaking life, the same unity renders them invincible. Whatever the future holds for Smith’s assorted Noras, a brave new tomorrow is there for the taking.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here