Festival Dance
Hard to be Soft: A Belfast Prayer
Lyceum, Edinburgh
Mary Brennan
****
THE prospect of a hard border re-emerging between the North and the South of Ireland surely sharpens the visceral impact of Oona Doherty’s Hard to be Soft: A Belfast Prayer.
In it, her childhood city and its people are brought vividly centre-stage in a spirit of concern and hope. Unvarnished, explicit vox-pops and closely-observed body language are melded into movement that, across four short episodes, becomes a fervent “physical prayer” for working-class Belfast to move on from the Troubles of the past.
The opening solo – Lazarus and the Birds of Paradise – picks up on the combative aggression of various male voices swaggering on the soundscore. Dressed entirely in truce-seeking white, Doherty’s small frame assumes the poses of street fighting men, throwing punches, reeling under answering blows.
Meanwhile Ciaran Bagnall’s set design of floor-to-ceiling white bars suggests a cage-cum-prison cell where any signs of ‘soft’ emotions get locked away.
Cue The Sugar Army! Recruited from House of Jack, a Leith-based hip-hop collective, they represent the tribe of Belfast girlies who outface grim realities by partying full-on: they totally rock!
Episode Three, Meat Kaleidoscope. Ingrained macho resistance to any physical contact that’s not hostile comes barreling to the fore. John Scott and Sam Finnegan, both shirtless and decidedly big-bellied, certainly touch – but it’s okay: they’re wrestling. Flesh slams against sweaty flesh. Hands grab and grapple. Is it their own inner demons or each other that they’re fighting?
Either way, the pummellings are fraught, and desperate. To survive, something in them has to give: the moment the futile tussling shades into a bear hug is a brief glimmer of what Doherty is reaching for in the final section, Helium.
This time her solo is looking for a kind of closure, a freefall state where – hard-bitten men especially – can admit to uncertainties, can open hearts and minds to a kinder future. How you wish her Belfast prayer would hold true post-Brexit…
Sponsored by Edinburgh Gin
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here