The Great Pretender
Susannah Cahalan
Canongate, £16.99
Review by Alastair Mabbott
For good or ill – but really both – American psychiatry was never the same after David Rosenhan. In 1969, the Stanford professor faked hearing voices to gain admittance to a mental hospital and experience the system from the inside.
Over the next three years, under his guidance, seven more sane people bluffed their way into psychiatric institutions across the US. All were diagnosed with schizophrenia, except one, who was assessed as manic-depressive. The results, when published under the title “Being Sane in Insane Places”, exposed an inconvenient truth: the American psychiatric system couldn’t distinguish between the sane and the insane. That they also highlighted widespread dehumanisation and neglect didn’t help either.
Susannah Cahalan, who researched their story more than 40 years later, has a personal stake in it. Aged 24, she fell into a psychotic state and was on the verge of being institutionalised when one bright doctor suggested that her symptoms might have a physical cause. Her condition turned out to be a brain inflammation caused by an autoimmune disease, and Cahalan doesn’t doubt that her doctor saved her from a grim and hopeless existence in an institution.
The story of David Rosenhan and his “pseudopatients” was bound to resonate with her. But researching the background to his hugely influential article raised not only difficult questions about mental illness but also doubts about the veracity of Rosenhan’s work.
The Great Pretender recounts her attempts to track down the pseudonymous pseudopatients, check the accuracy of Rosenhan’s claims and tackle the question of why he later cooled off on the subject, failing to deliver a promised book to Doubleday, who sued him to get their advance back. She meets Harry Lando, the subject excluded from the final study, whose reports of a “benign atmosphere” and “genuine and caring” environment at the hospital he infiltrated didn’t fit the picture Rosenhan ultimately presented.
But more interesting still is her account of the part Rosenhan’s article played in the reshaping of American psychiatry. Inadvertently, “Being Sane in Insane Places” lent weight to DSM-III (the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), which “remedicalised” mental health as a standardised box-ticking exercise. As well as leading to an explosion of diagnoses of ADHD and autism in children, DSM-III ushered in an era when monolithic psychiatric hospitals fell from favour. Unfortunately, the funds promised to facilitate care in the community never materialised, and the mentally ill were pushed further into the margins, towards homelessness and prison. “Rosenhan did not create these outcomes,” she writes, “but his study enabled them.”
Nevertheless, however much he may have fabricated, and whatever the negative effects of his work, he “touched on a truth”, exposing a flaw at the heart of psychiatry, and somehow Cahalan finds herself able to end on a positive note. “I believe in all the excitement emerging from neuroscience,” she claims, and sees progress in such areas as the weakening of Big Pharma and the current psychedelic revival. But coming at the end of a book depicting American psychiatry as a series of shambolic lurches from one disastrous state of affairs to another, her optimism can’t help but feel forced.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here