Scottish Chamber Orchestra/Watanabe
City Halls, Glasgow
Keith Bruce
five stars
AS if the guest soloist for the music of Mr and Mrs Mahler being mezzo Karen Cargill was not sufficient reason for attending this SCO concert — and it most certainly was — the conductor deputising for an indisposed Mark Wigglesworth provided another. Kensho Watanabe impressed last March when he took charge of the RSNO’s Carmina Burana, and his facility with big music was on display again here with one of the largest SCO’s line-ups (including four flutes and four percussionists) playing Gustav Mahler’s 4th Symphony. As well as very fine ensemble across the strings, there was punchy soloing from leader Benjamin Marquise Gilmore, first horn Philip Munds and bassoon Annette Falk among many others.
Watanabe’s was a reading that contrived to be both stately and full of vim, culminating in Cargill singing The Heavenly Life from the choir stalls. There are some singers for whom that might have been a lousy idea, but it was perfect here, the folkloric source underlined as if she had appeared at an upstairs window in an Alpine village.
That orchestral gig is core repertoire for Scotland’s international singing star, but the six Alma Mahler songs she performed in the first half are less often heard, particularly in their 1996 Matthews orchestrations. Although she had the score in front of her, Cargill rarely consulted it, soaring effortlessly over the lush accompaniment on material that demands a voice of power across a wide range. A nocturnal light, setting Bierbaum, is close to being a show tune in its melody, and there are touches of that in the long narrative of the up-tempo lullaby In my father’s garden, and the closing Rilke setting. With some very fine playing from the start by Maximiliano Martin and his clarinet colleagues, this was a rare treat.
Mozart was a little older than the song-writing Alma Mahler when he composed Idomeneo, and the opera’s overture is less often heard in the concert hall than those for his Da Ponte collaborations. It made a fine opener to this programme, however, even if it has a somewhat weak ending as a stand-alone.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here