Music
RSNO/Sondergard
Usher Hall, Edinburgh
Keith Bruce
four stars
THE withdrawal of pianist and composer Fazil Say from his debut with the Royal Scottish National Orchestra, unconnected to the current health crisis as far as I am aware, meant some remodelling of the orchestra’s programme, and more specifically it occasioned the return of South Korean pianist Sunwook Kim, three years on from his last appearance with the RSNO.
Even a slightly ragged opening to Beethoven’s Emperor concerto on the part of conductor Thomas Sondergard and the orchestra did not put the returning hero off his stride. Sondergard took a very historically-informed approach to the work, somewhat austere, and definitely vibrato-free, but Sunwook Kim is a player who knows how to drive a Steinway, and there was never really any doubt whose show this was to be in the concert’s second half. The precision phrasing of the slow second movement, on which he was beautifully supported by the RSNO strings, was a particular delight, when the conductor and players appeared to be hanging on every note as much as the audience.
Sondergard had signalled his approach in the opening performance of Beethoven’s Coriolan Overture, which was perhaps a little slower than it is often heard, and had a particular spacious drama. For the RSNO Chorus’s involvement, after radical stage re-setting, the deployment of the forces on the platform was at first much less comfortable. Stravinsky’s Symphony of the Psalms, with the concert grands of Lynda Cochrane and Judith Keaney occupying the space vacated by the violins in its distinctive instrumental scoring, took a while to find a good balance, with the singers struggling to command attention.
By the Alleluia opening of the setting of Psalm 150, the longest section of the work, Sondergard had everything happily in shape, even if the impression remained that this repertoire is perhaps not this choir’s strongest suit. What was abundantly clear in that last movement, however, was how much of its sound-world was later borrowed by Leonard Bernstein for more commercial fare.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article