A growing minority of young Muslims are inspired by political Islam and feel they have less in common with non-Muslims than their parents do, a survey reveals today.
The poll found support for Sharia law, Islamic schools and wearing the veil in public is stronger among young Muslims than their parents.
While the majority of Muslims feel they have as much, if not more, in common with non-Muslims in Britain than with Muslims abroad, the figure dropped from 71% of over-55s to 62% among 16 to 24-year-olds, the survey of more than 1000 Muslims in the UK over the phone and internet for independent think-tank Policy Exchange found.
The percentage who said they would prefer to send their children to Islamic state schools increased from 19% for over 55-year-olds to 37% of those aged 16 to 24.
The number who said they would prefer to live under Sharia law than British law increased from 17% of over-55s to 37% of 16 to 24-year-olds.
One of Scotland's leading Muslims said he was not surprised by the survey results.
Bashir Maan, Scottish spokesman for the Muslim Council of Great Britain, said: "The selfish and hypocritical policies practised by George W Bush and Tony Blair in Afghanistan, Iraq and the Middle East, and controversies such as Jack Straw's attitude to Muslim women wearing veils and raids on the homes of Muslims, particularly in England, has led to the radicalisation of some members of the Muslim community.
"It is worrying that such policies are giving fuel to those who would promote radicalism. We don't want any young people to be radicalised. We want them to grow up as good Muslims and good citizens of the society they are living in."
Munira Mirza, the lead author of the report, said the results suggested government policy was to blame for sharpening divisions between Muslims and non-Muslims.
She said: "The emergence of a strong Muslim identity in Britain is, in part, a result of multicultural policies implemented since the 1980s which have emphasised difference at the expense of shared national identity and divided people along ethnic, religious and cultural lines."
According to the poll, 74% of 16 to 24-year-olds prefer Muslim women to choose to wear the hijab compared with only 28% of over 55s.
While 7% of all those surveyed "admire organisations like al Qaeda that are prepared to fight the West", the figure increased from 3% of over 55s to 13% among 16 to 24-year-olds.
Ms Mirza said: "There is clearly a conflict within British Islam between a majority that accepts the norms of Western democracy and a growing minority that does not."
She continued: "Religiosity among younger Muslims is not about following their parents' cultural traditions, but rather, their interest in religion is more politicised.
"Islamist groups have gained influence at local and national level by playing the politics of identity and demanding for Muslims the right to be different'."
The report also found that authorities and some Muslim groups had exaggerated the problem of Islamophobia, which had fuelled a sense of victimhood among Muslims.
Despite widespread concerns about Islamophobia, 84% of Muslims believed they had been treated fairly in British society.
Just over a quarter (28%) believed authorities in Britain had gone "over the top" in trying not to offend Muslims.
The poll found 75% believed it was wrong for High Wycombe local council to ban an advertisement for a Christmas carol service in 2003, and 64% said Dudley Council in the West Midlands was wrong to have banned all images of pigs from its offices in 2005 for fear of offending Muslims.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article