SPORTS
THERE had been times when manager Billy McNeill was unable to disguise
his annoyance when he heard it suggested that Frank McAvennie was
growing restless. The striker, we were all led to believe, would be
staying at Parkhead. The player himself had made it known he wanted to
remain with Celtic.
All, however, was not sweetness and light. McNeill, forced by
McAvennie's outburst after having been left out of the team which won
1-0 at Tynecastle on Saturday, has opened up. A sorry tale is revealed.
McAvennie, it transpires, is not merely restless. He already may have
packed his bags. Apparently he has worn a track in the carpet leading to
McNeill's office where, the manager said, the player has been an almost
weekly visitor in search of a move.
''I've had four written transfer requests from him since August,''
revealed McNeill. It transpires now that the player could be given his
wish, and his former club, West Ham, are anxious to buy him back. They
are likely to encounter stiff opposition from others such as Arsenal.
Naturally, Celtic's supporters, who have had to endure the departures
of splendid players such as Charlie Nicholas, Maurice Johnston and Brian
McClair in recent times, will be distraught. There even may be anger.
However, if McAvennie, who was bought from West Ham a couple of
seasons ago, is determined to pursue the ball elsewhere, there is little
the Parkhead club can do about it other than demand a suitable transfer
fee, as the striker is under contract until the end of next season.
Even if McNeill and the player were unwilling before now to admit
there were difficulties, it has been obvious that a degree of unrest
existed. McAvennie has another life in the south which he has been
unable to resist, but even so, he gave everything for Celtic's cause as
soon as he heard a referee's whistle. The manager admits to being a fan
of his abilities, and obviously will make every effort to solve any
problems the player may have.
Nevertheless, a man can take only so much, and McNeill's revelations
suggest he has put up with more than most. According to the manager, his
player, who said he was ill, did not turn up for work last Monday and
was included in the reserve team for a game against Motherwell after
having completed a light training session on Tuesday.
An ankle injury was reported on Wednesday and McAvennie had treatment,
but he failed to show for an afternoon session, as he had been
instructed to do. On Thursday he said he was ill, and after having
spoken to the doctor, McNeill decided not to risk the player on
Saturday.
This is McNeill's account of the background to McAvennie' public
announcement that he was fit, physically and mentally, to play against
Hearts.
McNeill suspects moves behind the scenes designed to clear the way for
McAvennie to leave Parkhead, but naturally enough, neither the player
nor his agent, Bill McMurdo, would associate themselves with such
shenanigans.
Whatever the outcome of this distasteful business, the real losers
will be those who follow Celtic faithfully. They are tired of hearing
players pledge themselves to the cause. It is time more professional
footballers kept their word.
Of course, they are entitled to earn as much as they can from the
game, but some are becoming like mercenaries. If every one of them
turned to mammon the game would be up very quickly. It is a game of high
finance, but also one of loyalty.
The advent of the agent
is something most managers dislike, but perhaps if directors had not
been so willing for so many years to hoodwink unsuspecting young talents
into signing away the best years of their lives for little reward,
football might not now be dealing with smooth-talkers.
The arrival of agents also might be a sad reflection on the
footballer's ability to think for himself, but whether or not any of us
like it, they have become part of the big-time game.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article