MR TONY BENN'S backbench Bill to abolish the common law offence of
blasphemy was introduced in the Commons yesterday.
The Religious Prosecutions (Abolition) Bill has been drawn up by the
Labour left-winger following the row over Salman Rushdie's book The
Satanic Verses.
Publication of the book renewed calls to extend the offence of
blasphemy to other religions besides Christianity.
Mr Benn, MP for Chesterfield, has made clear he would be against such
an extension and instead has proposed the offence be abolished
completely.
The Bill has cross-party support, including the former Liberal leader
Mr David Steel and former Tory Cabinet Minister Sir Ian Gilmour.
However, it stands virtually no chance of reaching the Statute Book.
The measure, which received a formal first reading, states that ''no
criminal proceedings shall be instituted against any person for schism,
heresy, blasphemous libel, blasphemy at common law, or atheism.''
Suggestions that Salman Rushdie should contribute to the cost of his
police protection from the proceeds of his book were rejected in the
Lords by a Government spokesman, the Earl of Arran.
Lord Arran said it would not be proper to disclose the cost to date of
police protection for Mr Rushdie.
However, he said the Home Office envisaged that Mr Rushdie would
continue to receive protection ''while the threat to him remains at the
current level''.
Tory Baroness Strange, calling for Mr Rushdie to help meet the cost of
the security, said it would be a ''kind gesture'' on his part towards
the long-suffering British taxpayer.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereCommments are closed on this article