WHEN it was first advertised, the concert given by the superlative Raphael Ensemble, rightly or wrongly, announced a different order of play to the one the string sextet actually adopted on Monday night, in one of the finest events promoted in recent times by the enterprising New Town Concerts Society. Originally, the performance of Bach's six-part Ricercar was to have been followed by Schoenberg's Verklarte Nacht, with Brahms's Sextet in G major occupying the second half of the concert.
In the event, the Brahms and Schoenberg works exchanged places in the programme, and it was piquant to wonder just what might have been the effect if Schoenberg's expressionist classic had remained where it was, and had followed the Bach. Such was the atmosphere of stillness and concentration generated by this wonderful group in a period-style performance of the Ricercar, played with intimacy and crystalline purity, that the plunge into the dark, nocturnal, and ultra-Romantic world of Transfigured Night might have been even more devastating than it was.
What a performance of the Schoenberg, with the rapport and ensemble-playing between these magical players, led by the burly, familiar figure of former SCO leader James Clark, absolutely seamless, and the complex textures of the music unusually translucent. Despite the rare, weightless quality the Raphael Ensemble brought to the music, it was at no cost to the intense ethos and hothouse atmosphere of this greatest of all instrumental psychodramas.
That same lightness of touch
- the mark of a truly exceptional group - characterised every page and nuance of the Brahms; anyone who considered this music to be remotely turgid would have been compelled to revise their opinion.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article