A Scot accused of carrying out the "biggest military computer hack of all time" yesterday launched a High Court fight to stop his extradition to the United States.
Gary McKinnon, 41, originally from Glasgow, is wanted by US authorities for allegedly breaking into 100 Pentagon and Nasa computers in a bid to find evidence of UFOs.
Home Secretary John Reid last year granted the US request to extradite him for trial.
Mr McKinnon's lawyers yesterday argued that he had been subjected to "improper threats" and warned that the self-confessed hacker could face up to 60 years in jail.
Supporters said McKinnon was being made a "scapegoat" for the shortcomings of security policies on US military networks.
Edmund Lawson, QC, yesterday told two judges at the High Court in London that US authorities had made threats during the plea bargaining attempt in 2003 which infringed his family and private life rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Mr Lawson said: "It was indicated that if he didn't co-operate there would be no repatriation because that could be effectively blocked by the prosecutor.
"That, we contend, was an improper threat that could engage this court's abuse of process jurisdiction."
Mr McKinnon has never denied he wandered around the computer networks of a wide number of US military institutions between February 2001 and March 2002. He was arrested in November 2002.
But he has maintained he was motivated by curiosity and only got into networks because of lax security.
Mr McKinnon has claimed that, while logged on to a Nasa computer, he saw - but was unable to save - a picture of a cigar-shaped UFO in orbit.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article