June 20.In his review of the world of comics (June 19) Kenneth Wright
says that American comics of the 1950s were ''credited with causing the
1954 expedition of some Glasgow schoolchildren . . . in search of a
child-eating vampire with metal teeth.''
While it is true that some people at the time did attribute this
incident to ''horror comics,'' he might have added that they did so
without a shred of evidence. As David Cornwell and I have tried to
demonstrate in our contribution to the book, Monsters with Iron Teeth
(Sheffield Academic Press, 1988), such ''hunts'' by children are by no
means uncommon. Furthermore, no-one has come with any comic featuring a
vampire with iron teeth; however, such monsters are to be found in
respectable places such as the Bible (Daniel 7.7) and ''Jenny wi' the
airn teeth,'' a poem found in the anthologies for schoolchildren.
The point is not a trivial one, for the Gorbals Vampire incident
featured prominently in the arguments of those campaigning for the
censorship of children's publications, and the case was quoted in the
House of Commons during the debates preceding the passing of the
Children and Young Persons (Harmful Publications) Act.
Kenneth Wright considers that ''some of these comics probably deserved
a little mild suppression,'' but can we ever take censorship as lightly
as that? It is one thing to express the view that something is
unpleasant; it is quite another to institute legal procedures to ban
what you consider unpleasant.
To justify that move, those involved in the moral panic of the time
tried to show that what was ''unpleasant'' was also ''harmful.'' The
Gorbals Vampire hunt was one of their favourite bits of ''evidence.'' It
is worth noticing just how weak that evidence was.
Sandy Hobbs,
414 Crow Road,
Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereCommments are closed on this article