GORDON LOWDEN is the president of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of Scotland. Last month he voted ''yes'' for a merger with
colleagues in England and Wales. The majority of Scots voted ''no''.
The whole thing has, he agrees, been a great experience. Very
interesting. Others might suggest dramatic, even traumatic. But senior
chartered accountants in Scotland don't use that kind of language.
Professor Lowden gives the voting figures, 55% in Scotland against
merger, with 94% in England and Wales voting for.
''Having studied the paper by the working party looking into the
situation,'' he says mildly, ''a merger was the way forward, to my mind.
The membership having rejected it, that is now water under the bridge.
The merger is dead.''
It could have meant a new British Institute, with around 100,000
members and 12,500 in Scotland. But many clearly feared it effectively
meant an end to a separate Scottish identity. That traces its roots to
1854, and an Accountants' Society in Edinburgh -- the first in the
world.
Was there a corollary to current devolutionary attitudes?
''I think there is a feeling that Scotland should stay Scottish,''
Professor Lowden acknowledges. ''How high you place that factor among
priorities involved in making a decision is difficult to say.
''The Scottish dimension was there. To lose the pre-eminent Scottish
position was something that stuck in the craw of a lot of people I
think. They couldn't give it up and move to a larger organisation.''
The essential requirement now, he points out, is not to go over the
past but to go ahead. There is a strategy review, drawn up before the
voting.
''We want to develop our education system so that it becomes more
flexible. We hope to train people in aspects of accounting apart from
auditing. Everyone should have a general basic background. Some will
concentrate on management accounting and industrial accounting and
others on finance and strategy. We are still feeling our way forward on
this.
''Undoubtedly we have strengths,'' he says firmly. ''We have our
education system. And we are a small body, relatively speaking. We can
communicate effectively with our membership. When people are involved
they become committed. We have always been a stubborn race.''
There are inevitably potential disadvantages -- weaknesses is not the
preferred word -- for a small organisation.
''Where larger groups make their voices known, government and other
bodies may be swayed by the multitude. One of our concerns is to get the
recognition we believe we deserve. We may have to work a bit harder, to
be recognised as a separate entity, with a voice to be heard.
''The way to achieve that,'' he adds, ''is to ensure we continue to
produce people of quality. That is why education and training is one of
our strengths.''
Independence may have problems. But problems are made to be overcome.
Someone who learned to play golf at two and still plays off six is not
going to be bunkered easily.
Equally someone who went to Strathallan, to take his Highers at 14, is
not afraid of hard work and application. Even having National Service
interrupt law studies at Cambridge need not be the end of the world.
Go back to university, at government expense this time. Take your
degree. Add a Blue in rugby. Do your accountancy training.
Get your qualifications, get your LLB, get married -- all in 1953. Set
up a department of accountancy at Dundee -- one lecturer and one student
soon becomes hundreds of students. A lecturer becomes a professor.
Nothing really changes.
Being a signalman in the navy was good training, for latter days.
Reading the signals is what a president has to do. Keeping two-way
communications is a basic requirement in life.
Golf remains a matter of great interest. As a member of Rules of Golf
Committee of the R&A he sees fair play.
''You give your views, if asked for. Telling people what to do is not
really the name of the game,'' he says.
It's the same with the Institute. The presidential year is going to be
a busy one. It needs application.
''We certainly don't intend to disappear as a Scottish body.
Credibility in fact is not our problem. People know about us. What we
have to do is to continue to attract the best students. They are our
life blood.
''Scots have a great belief in their own ability. We are proud of our
traditions. We hope to maintain them. When 1992 comes we have to be
ready. We have an important part to pay in accountancy. There is no
question of that.
''We are looking to see what we can achieve, together with other
bodies in the profession. I must say, I have no difficulty in living
with my neighbours.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article