A WITNESS in the Rosemary West murder trial yesterday admitted
suffering from hallucinations in which she was being followed around by
Frederick West.
Described in court only as ''Miss A'', she said she was brutally and
sadistically assaulted at the age of 15 in front of two naked young
girls at 25 Cromwell Street.
Miss A described how six weeks later she went with a can of petrol to
25 Cromwell Street intending to set fire to the building, but lost her
nerve.
She insisted she witnessed a similar sexual assault on one of the
young girls, whose age then she put at 13 or 14, before her own alleged
assault by both Frederick and Rosemary West.
The 13-year-old girl, a blonde, was clearly in pain and wept as she
was subjected to depraved sexual indignities, Miss A told the court.
When the Wests had finished with her, the witness said she was led to
the bed by Mrs West who bound her wrists and ankles in brown packing
tape.
Miss A told Winchester Crown Court she thought: ''God, I am next.''
She described how during the sexual attacks, Mrs West was a Jekyll and
Hyde figure. During the assault on the blonde girl, she spoke in an
aggressive voice. ''Next, it was as if she was being all motherly
again.''
Mrs West pleads not guilty to the murder of 10 young girls and women,
including that of her own daughter, Heather.
In cross-examination, Miss A admitted having a psychiatric background.
Over a number of years she had been treated for depression and had
received electro-convulsive therapy.
She denied the events she had described in court were a figment of her
imagination and that she had ever been diagnosed as schizophrenic.
Miss A did admit to having heard voices and having been followed
around by a man in black. She now knew that this was not real, but only
in her mind.
That man was Frederick West, found dead in a prison cell on New Year's
Day while on remand on 12 murder charges.
Miss A also admitted running away with Mrs West's younger brother, Mr
Graham Letts, when she was only 14 and having a full sexual relationship
with him one year before the alleged assault.
However, it was only last year she learned that Mr Letts and Mrs West
were brother and sister. As she began her evidence, Miss A, 33, wrote
her name on a piece of paper which was passed to the judge and jury. She
said she was taken into care at the age of 13 when her parents divorced.
She said a friend gave her an address as somewhere she could go if she
needed to. It was 25 Cromwell Street. She went there on eight or nine
occasions, the first just after her fourteenth birthday.
Asked how Mrs West appeared, Miss A replied: ''Very nice. She was like
a big sister-cum-young mum. She told me I could go there any time I
needed a shoulder to cry on. It felt as if someone really cared.''
She went to the address on Friday mornings between 11am and 1.15pm on
her way home to Tewkesbury for a weekend visit with her mother.
On the last occasion she went to 25 Cromwell Street, Mrs West answered
the door wearing a see-through blouse.
Miss A described being led into a front bedroom by Mrs West. There
were three other people in the room. Two of them were the two young
girls, both of whom were naked. Frederick West was dressed only in
shorts.
She said Mrs West started undressing her and saying things such as
''It is OK'', and ''We are all girls''. Mrs West undressed.
Miss A then described how the blonde girl's hands, wrists, and ankles
were taped. ''I could see from her face that she was hurting,'' said
Miss A. ''She was frightened.''
Mrs West committed sexual acts on the girl before Frederick West had
intercourse with her. Throughout Mrs West was asking: ''Are you enjoying
it, Fred? Is it turning you on?''
The witness said she was then led to the bed. ''God, I am next,'' she
said she thought. She wanted to scream, kick and cry but she did none of
that. She just felt numb.
All the time, Mrs West was telling her to relax and everything would
be OK. She said she was taped at the wrists and ankles, and then
described various sexual indignities she suffered, and of Mrs West
asking her husband if he was enjoying it.
She later hitched to Tewkesbury. She was crying, angry and upset. ''I
felt so ashamed. I just felt sick and felt stupid,'' she said. ''I felt
hate for Rosemary. I felt I trusted somebody and she had used me.''
She did not go to the police because she was in care and children in
care were regarded as being bad.
She described the visit to 25 Cromwell Street six weeks later when she
took with her a can of petrol and matches.
''I wanted revenge,'' the witness told the jury. ''I intended pouring
it through the letter box of their house and setting it on fire. But I
didn't. I stood there, just stood there. I wanted to do it so much.''
The witness said that she had never told anyone of her experiences
until the police came to her last year. Even then, she initially denied
she had ever been to Cromwell Street. It was only in August she finally
described what had happened to another officer.
Cross-examined by Mr Richard Ferguson QC, defending, Miss A agreed she
had signed a contract with a newspaper for #30,000 to be paid after the
trial for a story about how her life had been affected by the
experiences at Cromwell Street.
Mr Ferguson also said the witness had an unfortunate medical
background. She admitted she had been sexually abused by her father and
brother before being taken into care. On various occasions, she had
attended doctors saying she was pregnant, but tests proved negative.
Mr Ferguson insisted that she had fantasised over the events she
alleged had taken place at 25 Cromwell Street. ''It is a complete
figment of your imagination,'' he declared.
Miss A, who had wept throughout much of her evidence, declared: ''No
it isn't. I know what happened and so do they.'' The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article