Medical experts warn that new craze could leave people marked for life
PLASTIC surgeons warned yesterday that young people joining a craze for ''temporary'' tattoos could be left with permanent body markings.
The so-called temporary tattoos, which are offered in some hairdressing salons, have been touted as an alternative to the traditional variety. Temporary tattooists claim their work will rise to the top of the skin and vanish after three to five years, because they avoid breaching the skin's dermis - the inner layer of skin.
But medical experts said yesterday that the theory behind temporary tattoos was fundamentally flawed and the designs may never disappear. Professional tattooists also warned that people who had bought temporary tattoos were ''guinea pigs''.
Mr Arthur Morris, a consultant plastic surgeon at Ninewells Hospital in Dundee, said: ''There will be a lot of very upset people in a few years' time. Tattoos are either permanent or they are very temporary.
''A tattoo only lasts if it goes into the dermis. There is no possible middle ground. There is no way I know of that you could hope that a tattoo could last for a few years and then rise to the surface or simply disappear. Some people will be forced to get permanent cover-up tattoos, while others will have to pay several hundred pounds to have it removed privately.''
Mr Iain Mackay, a plastic surgeon at Canniesburn Hospital, Bearsden, near Glasgow, who specialises in laser treatment of tattoos, said that if pigment was introduced into the dermis a tattoo would almost inevitably be absorbed. Conversely, one placed superficially on the epidermis would disappear within a few days or weeks as skin was shed.
Mr Khalil Nakib, a plastic surgeon at St John's Hospital in Livingston, said: ''There is a lot of movement of pigment when it is introduced into the skin.
''Pigment will either migrate to the outside and disappear or migrate deeper and become permanent. I don't know of any way to keep it stable at one level.''
Plastic surgeons have in recent years seen a decline in the popularity of tattoos, but there are fears that the promise of a temporary version - despite costing up to three times that of a permanent one - could have sparked a revival.
Ms Kate Leisk, 20, a student at Stirling University, had a #60 12-inch dragon Temptoo down her right upper-arm, shoulder and neck in January. She claimed yesterday that her tattooist had assured her it would fade.
''I know that many employers don't like tattoos, and later, when I'm old and wrinkly, I may not want it myself,'' she said.
''The fact it may be permanent hasn't quite sunk in. If I had known, I wouldn't have had it, especially in such a visible place. It will be like hell waiting for five years to find out.''
Secretary of the Association of Professional Tattoo Artists Lal Hardy said: ''Professional tattoo studios won't go near these so-called temporary tattoos. It is hairdressers and market stalls who are doing them. The people actually doing it may even believe the tattoos are temporary, but those getting them are guinea pigs.''
Mr Patrick Gorman, who until recently offered temporary tattoos at Stirling hairdressers The Cutting Crew, said that to his knowledge the process was safe.
''I tell people they may last for up to nine years, although our suppliers tell us it is usually three to five years. We have a cap which goes on to the needle to make sure it can't go too far into the skin,'' he said.
However, Ms Yvonne Carter, managing director of Tyneside-based CD International, which markets Temptoo, said: ''We don't claim we are selling temporary tattoos. We are selling Temptoos, which are like a pigmentation.
''Others may claim they are doing temporary tattoos, we don't. Salons should be telling their clients that they don't or might not disappear, but we as suppliers don't take any responsibility for third parties.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article