A LABOUR council leader was urged to resign last night after nearly a third of his own party voted with the SNP to push through a vote of no confidence in him.
The move to ditch West Dunbartonshire Council leader Andrew White follows a special meeting to discuss an employment tribunal which heavily criticised Mr White over events leading to the dismissal of Ian Leitch, former deputy chief executive, who was awarded #54,000 for unfair dismissal.
Four out of 14 Labour councillors switched sides to vote with the SNP, which resulted in a 12-10 vote.
Last night, however, a Labour spokesman said there had been a great deal of confusion in the council chamber. ''The motion only recommends a vote of no confidence,'' he said. However, Ronnie McColl, SNP group leader, was in no doubt.
He said: ''The successful vote of no confidence spells out that the positions of Mr White and Councillor Jim McCallum are now untenable. They no longer hold the support of the council and should resign with immediate effect.''
He said the dismissal of Ian Leitch had rumbled on for more than three years.
''In this time, we have had claim and counter-claim. Throughout the affair, the SNP's position never changed. We continually asked for a totally independent investigation into the affair.''
The Glasgow tribunal accepted a desire to get rid of the #73,000-a-year senior council official was the principal reason for a top management shake-up at the council and referred to the disastrous relationship between Mr Leitch, 52, and Mr White, and James McCallum, secretary.
It said Mr White had made up his mind he could not work with Mr Leitch. It accepted the desire to get rid of Mr Leitch was the principal reason for a council reorganisation and the actings of the council were plainly consistent with a desire to get rid of him.
After failing to get two top jobs in the new structure, Mr Leitch said he was given a ''resign or be sacked'' ultimatum and was not even allowed to work his notice. The tribunal concluded this amounted to a dismissal.
It added: ''We appreciate the seriousness of our finding, but the naked hostility towards the applicant, the manner in which the applications by the applicant for employment with the respondents were dealt with, the willingness of the said McCallum to adopt underhand methods, the complete failure on the part of the respondents to explain why they took certain crucial decisions persuade us that the said McCallum and White acted from an improper motive.''
Last night Mr White said of the vote: ''This result is disappointing. It has nothing to do with the running of the council and everything to do with the SNP playing politics.
''It is especially disappointing that a small number of Labour councillors colluded with the SNP to bring to pass this motion. The action of this small group is now a matter for the Labour Party.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article