Aberdeen have agreed to put want-away midfielder Craig Hignett on the transfer list, and have even paid the player a #17,500 loyalty bonus.
That sum is due every three months of the richest contract ever handed out to a player at Pittodrie. Hignett, weary of the lengthy round-trips to see his two children in Warrington in recent weeks after a marriage break-up, has dismissed claims that he was using his domestic situation to seal a move back down south.
The former Middlesbrough man had actually threatened to quit the Dons if they did not agree to sell him, but manager Alex Miller and chairman
Stewart Milne refused to condemn the player's actions after a meeting with him at Pittodrie yesterday.
In fact, all three refused to make any comment at all on the situation, leaving the fans in the dark during a time of crisis at
the club.
The issue was dealt with in a two-paragraph statement which read: ''Aberdeen Football Club today announced that following a meeting this afternoon between Stewart Milne, Alex Miller and Craig Hignett, it was agreed that Craig would be made available for transfer.
''Craig Hignett confirmed that while still at Aberdeen Football Club he would be totally committed to helping the team progress up the league.''
However, if the player is as emotionally upset as he claims to be, then surely his presence is the last thing the team need as they try to end a run of 11 games without a win.
If Hignett's previous comments are right then Milne talked him in to signing after he had already voiced doubts about moving to Aberdeen in the summer.
Aberdeen were aware of Hignett's domestic situation when they made him the club's highest-paid player, on reported #8,000-a-week wages.
The only certainty is that Aberdeen will not let the Liverpool-born player go cheaply and will look for at least a #1m fee or equivalent swop deal.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article