A gamekeeper on a neighbouring Royal Deeside estate to the Queen at Balmoral was yesterday fined #120 at Stonehaven Sheriff Court for using an illegal trap.
James Davidson, 46, of Tynabaich Cottage, Crathie, who works on the Invercauld Estate, admitted a charge under the Wildlife and Countryside Act, in that he used a spring trap - banned for almost a century - to catch a rook.
The court was told he had set the trap at the rear of his cottage on the morning of July 4, to catch a rook which had been eating rabbits - which he had trapped in snares.
The barely-alive bird, caught by a leg, was later found by a passer-by walking his dog who called the police.
Fiscal Ernest Barbour said: ''Spring traps in the open have been illegal since 1904, and setting such a thing is totally indiscriminate to what kind of bird it will catch.''
The court was told the conviction might affect Davidson's right to hold shotgun and firearm licences which he needed for his work on the estate.
Defending, Mr Taco Nolf said the gamekeeper regularly trapped rabbits which he sold to supplement his income of #600 a month. On the days previous to the incident, the father-of-four had spotted a rook eating the rabbits and set the spring trap to catch it.
He added: ''This is an area very well known to my client, within 100 yards of his house, and he knew there were no birds of prey about.''
Later, senior RSPB officer Dave Dick said he thought Davidson's career history compounded the crime.
''He has been doing this job for 30 years and he knew that putting a spring trap out in the open was illegal.
''It is more culpable that an experienced gamekeeper is using well-known illegal trapping matter,'' he added.
A spokesman for Scottish Natural Heritage said that while spring traps are recognised for catching rodents, they should be in a pipe or a tunnel.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article