By David Love A senior adviser to the Chief Constable of a Scottish police force is facing prosecution after allegedly circulating an e-mail criticising his boss.
Dr Paul Monaghan, head of planning and development at Northern Constabulary's Inverness headquarters, was set to face a disciplinary hearing last week.
However, it is understood he failed to turn up and has quit Northern Constabulary. A report has been sent to area procurator fiscal, Andrew Laing.
Mr Laing confirmed: "I can confirm that a report was received from Professional Standards of Northern Constabulary relating to Mr Monaghan and one other person. The matter has been investigated by the office of the area procurator fiscal and the matter has been reported to Crown Office.
"Persons have been charged in this case but I am not revealing the nature of the charges. Identification is not an issue. Proceedings are active."
Dr Monaghan was suspected of being involved in an e-mailed questionnaire to staff and police board members about the controversial internal review into cutting the eight Northern Constabulary policing division areas to three. Chief Constable Ian Latimer was criticised.
Dr Monaghan, 43, who lives with his partner in Contin, Ross-shire, was seconded to Highland Council last spring and was the local authority's acting performance manager. However, in July, police officers came to the chief executive's office at the council and escorted him from the building in Inverness. It is believed he was taken to cells and questioned for several hours by detectives.
Dr Monaghan was suspended by the force, which was still his official employer, but he could not continue to work in the council's HQ.
Mr Latimer was furious about the e-mail as it asked if he had lost the respect and support of his staff. It also questioned the effectiveness of senior managers and asked whether the Police Board should abandon the review.
Computer experts were called in to trace its origins and the focus of the inquiry switched to Dr Monaghan and an unnamed woman not employed by Northern Constabulary.
A police spokeswoman confirmed the suspension at the time, but yesterday she said: "We do not comment on internal staff matters."
But Dr Monaghan said: "I am very pleased and proud to have worked with operational police officers and staff of Northern Constabulary for six years. However, I am very disappointed with the way I have been treated by the force. Therefore I have chosen to resign and move on to pastures new. I am not aware of what criminal offence I am accused of committing."
He worked for Northern Constabulary for several years, playing a key role in formulating strategy for the force, notably on antisocial behaviour. He represented the force on the Highland Wellbeing Alliance.
It is the second time the force has come down hard on someone is suspected of being involved in leaking or criticising aspects of its force review. Last December, two civilian staff were accused of "spying" on senior police officers and suspended after an alleged security breach. Northern Constabulary's IT manager Gordon Gallacher, 55, and his deputy Paul Patience, 34, were escorted out of the headquarters a week before Christmas after another investigation by the professional standards unit.
It is understood they were suspected of hacking into confidential minutes of meetings about the review which began in 2006 as part of a project to examine the force's functions and staff levels. They were reinstated in February this year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article